Published On: Sun, Dec 22nd, 2019

Whatever happened to a Next Big Things?

In tech, this was a smartphone decade. In 2009, Symbian was still a widespread ‘smartphone’ OS, though 2010 saw a launch of a iPhone 4, a Samsung Galaxy S, and a Nexus One, and currently Android and iOS exaggerate 4 billion total active devices. Smartphones and their apps are a mature market, now, not a disruptive new platform. So what’s next?

The doubt presupposes that something has to be next, that this is a law of nature. It’s easy to see since it competence seem that way. Over a final thirty-plus years we’ve lived by 3 massive, overlapping, world-changing record height shifts: computers, a Internet, and smartphones. It seems unavoidable that a fourth contingency be on a horizon.

There have positively been no necessity of nominees over a final few years. AR/VR; blockchains; chatbots; a Internet of Things; drones; self-driving cars. (Yes, self-driving cars would be a platform, in that whole new sub-industries would explode around them.) And nonetheless one can’t assistance though notice that any singular one of those has depressed distant brief of confident predictions. What is going on?

You competence remember that a expansion of PCs, a Internet, and smartphones did not ever demeanour rootless or faltering. Here’s a list of Internet users over time: from 16 million in 1995 to 147 million in 1998. Here’s a list of smartphone sales given 2009: Android went from sub-1-million units to over 80 million in only 3 years. That’s what a vital height change looks like.

Let’s review any of a above, shall we? we don’t cruise it’s an astray comparison. Each has had champions arguing it will, in fact, be That Big, and even people with some-more totalled expectations have likely expansion will during slightest follow a trajectory of smartphones or a Internet, despite maybe to a obtuse peak. But in fact…

AR/VR: Way behind in 2015 we spoke to a unequivocally good famous VC who quietly likely a building of 10 million inclination per year good before a finish of this decade. What did we get? 3.7M to 4.7M to 6M, 2017 by 2019, while Oculus keeps removing reorg’ed. A 27% annual expansion rate is OK, sure, though a consistent 27% expansion rate is some-more than a small worrying for an purported subsequent large thing; it’s a long, prolonged approach from “10xing in 3 years.” Many people also likely that by a finish of this decade Magic Leap would demeanour like something other than an complete shambles. Welp. As for other AR/VR startups, their state is best described as “sorry.”

Blockchains: we mean, Bitcoin’s doing only fine, sure, and is simply a weirdest and many engaging thing to have happened to tech in a 2010s; though a whole rest of a space? I’m broadly a follower in cryptocurrencies, though if we were to have suggested in mid-2017 to a loyal follower that, by a finish of 2019, craving blockchains would radically be dead, decentralized app use would still be totalled in a low thousands, and no genuine new use cases would have arisen other than collateralized lending for a little sect — we mean, they would have been outraged. And yet, here we are.

Chatbots: No, seriously, chatbots were distinguished as a height of a destiny not so prolonged ago. (Alexa, about that some-more in a bit, is not a chatbot.) “The universe is about to be re-written, and bots are going to be a large partial of a future” was an tangible quote. Facebook M was a future. It no longer exists. Microsoft’s Tay was a future. It unequivocally no longer exists. It was transposed by Zo. Did we know that? we didn’t. Zo also no longer exists.

The Internet of Things: let’s demeanour during a few new headlines, shall we? “Why IoT Has Consistently Fallen Short of Predictions.” “Is IoT Dead?” “IoT: Yesterday’s Predictions vs. Today’s Reality.” Spoiler: that final one does not plead about how existence has blown prior predictions out of a water. Rather, “The existence incited out to be distant reduction rosy.”

Drones: now, a lot of unequivocally cold things are function in a worker space, I’ll be a initial to aver. But we’re a prolonged approach divided from earthy packet-switched networks. Amazon teased Prime Air smoothness approach behind in 2015 and done a initial worker smoothness approach behind in 2016, that is also when it law a airship mom ship. People approaching good things. People still design good things. But we cruise it’s satisfactory to contend they approaching … a bit some-more … by now.

Self-driving cars: We were betrothed so most more, and I’m not even articulate about Elon Musk’s hyperbole. From 2016: “10 million self-driving cars will be on a highway by 2020.” “True self-driving cars will arrive in 5 years, says Ford“. We do technically have a few, using in a sealed commander devise in Phoenix, pleasantness of Waymo, though that’s not what Ford was articulate about: “Self-driving Fords that have no steering wheels, stop or gas pedals will be in mass prolongation within 5 years.” So, 18 months from now, then. 12 months left for that “10 million” prediction. You’ll pardon a certain doubt on my part.

The above doesn’t meant we haven’t seen any successes, of course. A lot of new kinds of products have been engaging hits: AirPods, a Apple Watch, a Amazon Echo family. All 3 are some-more new interfaces than whole new vital platforms, though; not so most a bullion rush as a singular capillary of silver.

You competence notice we left appurtenance training / AI off a list. This is in partial since it really has seen genuine qualitative leaps, though a) there seems to be a ubiquitous regard that we competence have entered a flattening of an S-curve there, rather than continued hypergrowth, b) possibly way, it’s not a platform. Moreover, a wall that both drones and self-driving cars have strike is labelled General Purpose Autonomy … in other words, it is an AI wall. AI does many extraordinary things, though when people likely 10M self-driving cars on a roads subsequent year, it means they likely AI would be good adequate to expostulate them. In fact it’s removing there a lot slower than we expected.

Any one of these technologies could conclude a subsequent decade. But another possibility, that we have to during slightest consider, is that none of them might. It is not an incontrovertible law of inlet that only as one vital tech height starts to mature another contingency fundamentally start a rise. We competence good see a extensive opening before a subsequent Next Big Thing. Then we competence see dual or 3 arise simultaneously. But if your direct devise is that this time you’re totally going to get in on a belligerent building — well, I’m here to advise you, we competence have a prolonged wait in store.

About the Author

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these html tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>