Published On: Tue, Jul 28th, 2020

Vicariously mimics another person’s Twitter feed regulating lists, though it violates Twitter rules

That Vicariously app we competence have seen cocktail adult in your chatter feed around a small viral expansion hacking has run aground on Twitter’s automation rules. We reached out about it after it started spamming my feed with ‘so and so has combined we to a list’ notifications and Twitter says that a app is not in compliance.

Updates below.

To be fair, they did also contend they ‘love’ it — though that it will have to find a opposite approach to do what it does.

“We adore that Vicariously uses Lists to assistance people find new accounts to follow and get new perspectives. However, a approach a app is now doing this is in defilement of Twitter’s automation rules,” Twitter pronounced in a statement. “We’ve reached out to them to find a approach to move a app into correspondence with a rules.”

The app was finished by Jake Harding, an businessman who built it as a side project.

The app, that we can find here, enumerates a supporters of a aim comment and builds a list out of a accounts that it follows. This enables we to emanate lists that are snapshots of a accurate (minus algorithmic tweak) feed that any given user sees when they open their app. Intriguing, right?

Well, it turns out Twitter has finished this themselves twice before. Once in 2011 and creatively waaaay behind in 2009. The product had a built in underline that authorised we to only click by and perspective someone’s supporter graph as a feed with a tap.

I was there in 2009 when it was a thing, and we can tell we that it was only prosaic out cold to see someone else’s graph going by. In a early flourishing days it was unequivocally engaging to see who was following who or what. It arrange of taught we how to ‘do’ Twitter when everybody was training it together. we can see because Harding wanted a transcribe of this in sequence to re-create this feeling of ‘snapshotting’ someone else’s info apparatus.

Unfortunately, one of a large side effects of a approach that Vicariously duplicates this underline regulating an programmed ‘list builder’ is that it spams each chairman it adds to a list given that Twitter always notifies we when someone adds we to a list and there is no stream approach to change that behavior.

So we see a lot of ‘added to their list‘ tweets and notis.

There are also other issues with a way  that Vicariously works to build open lists of people’s supporter graphs. There is intensity for abuse here in that it could be used to aim a people that a targeted comment follows. One of a vital reasons Twitter killed this underline twice is that a whole thing feels hyper personal. Your Twitter supporter graph is something that you, theoretically, curate. Though a lot of people have turn some-more performative with follows and instead, ironically, supplement a people they wish to ‘follow’ to lists.

Having your graph open is something that felt sparkling and junction during one indicate in Twitter’s life. But a universe might be too large and too nasty now for something like this to feel unequivocally gentle if it ever spreads over a technorati/Twitter energy user crowd. We’ll see we guess.

Oh, and Twitter, it is about time we built in a ‘can not be combined to lists’ feature. Otherwise, as someone reminded me around DM, we run a risk of creation all of a same mistakes as Facebook.

Update Jul 27th 7:50PM PT. Harding posted some tweets from a central Vicariously comment observant that he is adding some remoteness controls to a app. He also records that he’s anticipating to work with a Twitter developer family group to build out a product in a approach that prevents abuse.

About the Author