Published On: Wed, Jan 31st, 2018

Twitter now says 1.4 million people interacted with Russian trolls during 2016 presidential campaign


Twitter has now updated a series of people enchanting with Russian trolls during a 2016 presidential debate to 1.4 million. That’s some-more than double a initial 677,775 Twitter creatively pronounced had seen, followed or retweeted one of these accounts progressing this month.

The new series reflects those who might have also replied to or @ mentioned these accounts.

“We have stretched a series of people told about interactions with Twitter accounts potentially connected to a promotion bid by a Russian government-linked classification famous as a Internet Research Agency,” Twitter pronounced in a update. “Our idea in providing these notifications is to allege open recognition of and rendezvous with a critical issues lifted in a blog post, and yield larger clarity to a comment holders and a public.”

Twitter also pronounced it would usually forewarn these people of certain interactions though that it would not be notifying everybody who ever saw one of these accounts on a platform.

However, Twitter also remarkable it might forewarn some-more people in a future. “As a examination continues, we might also email additional users,” Twitter said. “If and when we do so, we will do a best to keep a open updated.”

The sum series of Russian-linked goblin accounts, as we reported progressing in January, is over 50,000, of that 3,800 were suspicion to be from a Internet Research Agency (IRA).

The IRA is a Russian association with Kremlin ties that has been unprotected as organizing eloquent disinformation campaigns in a U.S. and elsewhere — including attempting to change a 2016 presidential election.

The news furthers a notice that amicable media platforms like Twitter and Facebook, that has concurred a possess Russian goblin army problems during a election, are not creation adequate of an bid to shiver disinformation campaigns that have contributed to moving a voting public.

Further — and notwithstanding a guarantee of some-more clarity — a presentation seems to have combined to a confusion. Ars Technica’s Cyrus Farivar, who was sent one of a presentation emails, lamented that Twitter didn’t name names. “What accurately am we ostensible to do with this email?,” Farivar asked.

Here’s a full refurbish from Twitter’s blog:

Updated on Jan 31, 2018

We have stretched a series of people told about interactions with Twitter accounts potentially connected to a promotion bid by a Russian government-linked classification famous as a Internet Research Agency. Our notice efforts are focused on certain forms of interactions, and they will not ring each chairman that ever saw this content. Our idea in providing these notifications is to allege open recognition of and rendezvous with a critical issues lifted in a blog post, and yield larger clarity to a comment holders and a public.

We have now sent notices to Twitter users with an active email residence who a annals prove are formed in a US and tumble into during slightest one of a following categories:

  • People who directly intent during a choosing duration with a 3,814 IRA-linked accounts we identified, possibly by Retweeting, quoting, replying to, mentioning, or fondness those accounts or calm combined by those accounts;
  • People who were actively following one of a identified IRA-linked accounts during a time those accounts were suspended; and
  • People who opt out of receiving many email updates from Twitter and would not have perceived a initial notice formed on their email settings.

Approximately 1.4 million people have now perceived a presentation from Twitter. We will be promulgation a brief consult to a tiny organisation of people who perceived a presentation to benefit feedback on this process. As a examination continues, we might also email additional users. If and when we do so, we will do a best to keep a open updated.

 

About the Author

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these html tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>