Published On: Mon, Jan 30th, 2017

Silicon Valley Reacts to President Trump’s Immigration Orders

Ashton Kutcher isn’t a usually one protesting opposite Friday’s executive sequence – widely famous as a Muslim ban. Several celebrities, tech companies, and executives in Silicon Valley have come out in antithesis of what’s being called an immigration ban. Multiple tech luminaries are facing a ban, and charity to benefaction to the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) following a dramatization of a immigration order.

The executive sequence was sealed on Friday by President Donald Trump, banning entrance for 90 days to refugees and visa holders from 7 countries – Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, and Yemen. Since a sequence was signed, thousands of visitors, students, and immature label holders have been stopped from roving to a country, sparking national protests and sit-ins during vital airports. The anathema on immature label holders has now been relaxed.

Along with these protests, vital tech firms – who substantially have some-more depending on a immigrants around a creation than any other attention – have oral out opposite a ban, a disastrous impacts on businesses and a economy, and have also charity to benefaction to ACLU after a classification sued over President Trump’s executive sequence on immigration. The donations are 6 times what a ACLU routinely receives in one year in online donations.

Here’s how tech companies are reacting to a immigration ban.

Google – $4 million in predicament fund

One of a strongest reactions came from Google. In an inner memo, CEO Sundar Pichai pronounced it is “painful to see a personal cost of this executive sequence on a colleagues.” Google co-founder Sergey Brin was also speckled during a impetus during San Francisco International Airport.

Earlier, Google had ordered a influenced staff back to a United States. Pichai said that a association is “concerned about a impact of this sequence and any proposals that could levy restrictions on Googlers and their families, or that emanate barriers to bringing good talent to a U.S.”

“It’s unpleasant to see a personal cost of this executive sequence on a colleagues. We’ve always finished a perspective on immigration issues famous publicly and will continue to do so.”

The association has also combined a $2 million predicament account that can be matched by adult to $2 million in donations from employees. The account will go to four campaigning organizations – a American Civil Liberties Union, Immigrant Legal Resource Center, International Rescue Committee and UNHCR. This is a company’s largest charitable debate ever.

Uber – $3 million invulnerability fund

Uber has created a $3m invulnerability account to cover authorised and immigration issues for a staff impacted by Friday’s executive order. The account will assistance cover legal, immigration and interpretation costs for drivers influenced by a transport ban. Founder Travis Kalanick (a member of Trump’s Policy Forum) pronounced a “ban will impact many trusting people – an emanate that we will lift this entrance Friday when we go to Washington for President Trump’s initial business advisory organisation meeting.”

The association had faced clever recoil when it promoted disabling swell pricing nearby John F. Kennedy International Airport during a cab strike over a weekend. Kalanick apologized for a “confusion” and also announced donating $3 million to set adult a authorised invulnerability account for influenced drivers. But, many see this concession as a late response to a executive order, call a #deleteuber Twitter campaign.

Apple responds to immigration ban

There are no reports nonetheless if Apple is appropriation to debate opposite a executive order. However, a association CEO Tim Cook sent an email to his staff, observant that it is “not a process we support.”

In my conversations with officials here in Washington this week, I’ve finished it transparent that Apple believes deeply in a significance of immigration – both to a association and to a nation’s future. Apple would not exist but immigration, let alone flower and innovate a approach we do.

Lyft – $1 million to ACLU

Lyft is one of a few tech companies who were a initial to impugn a immigration ban. Along with pledging to benefaction $1 million over a subsequent 4 years to a ACLU, a association gave a following statement:

Throughout a history, Lyft has worked tough to emanate an inclusive, different and responsible village where all of a drivers and passengers feel acquire and respected. Banning people of a sold sacrament from entering a U.S. is antithetical to both Lyft’s and a nation’s core values.

We ask that we continue to be there for any other – and together, continue proof a energy of community.


Netflix CEO Reed Hastings strongly slammed the order, observant that President “Trump’s actions are so un-American it heedfulness us all.”

Trump’s actions are spiteful Netflix employees around a world, and are so un-American it heedfulness us all. Worse, these actions will make America reduction protected (through loathing and detriment of allies) rather than some-more safe.

A really unhappy week, and some-more to come with a lives of over 600,000 Dreamers here in a America underneath approaching threat. It is time to couple arms together to strengthen American values of leisure and opportunity.

Slack’s greeting to immigration ban

Slack CEO Stewart Butterfield posted several tweets criticizing a ban. “My grandfather came from Poland between a wars, during 17, sponsored by an elder sister. Two some-more siblings finished it. Everyone else died.”

Elon Musk (Tesla, SpaceX)

Elon Musk – who recently assimilated President Trump’s process organisation and Manufacturing Jobs Initiative – pronounced final week that people should stop aggressive Trump since it achieves nothing. But, he responded to a immigration ban, observant a “blanket entrance anathema on adults from certain essentially Muslim countries is not a best approach to residence a country’s challenges.”

“Many people negatively influenced by this process are clever supporters of a US,” Musk tweeted. “They’ve finished right, not wrong don’t merit to be rejected.” He also asked his supporters to send amendments to him. “Will find advisory legislature accord benefaction to President.”

Airbnb – giveaway housing to “anyone not authorised in a USA”

Unlike other tech companies, a executive sequence goes directly opposite a core goal of Airbnb – anyone can go anywhere. CEO Brian Chesky cursed a immigration anathema and went one step serve by charity giveaway housing to “anyone not authorised in a USA.”

Airbnb is regulating a existent disaster response program. This module asks Airbnb hosts to offer housing to people replaced by healthy disasters or to assist service workers. The association has also matched adult to $1 million in donations to a UN Refugee Agency.

Our concentration is on providing housing to people who have been negatively impacted by President Trump’s executive order, quite people who were roving to a U.S. and are now stranded.

We are responding to requests from people who have reached out to us directly and we are also operative with service organizations to serve brand people in need of proxy housing due to a transport ban.


Unlike other vital tech companies and executives, Microsoft didn’t strongly conflict what’s being called as “Trump’s many argumentative act yet,” observant that a association shares a concerns of those affected. Satya Nadella pronounced that a association “will continue to disciple on this vicious topic.”

“We share a concerns about a impact of a executive sequence on a employees from a listed countries, all of whom have been in a United States lawfully, and we’re actively operative with them to yield authorised recommendation and assistance.”

A vital supervision contractor, Microsoft’s tinge became a small some-more vicious after on. The association orator pronounced a pierce is “misguided and a elemental step backwards.”

There are some-more effective ways to strengthen open reserve but formulating so most material repairs to a country’s repute and values.


The association is providing support to influenced employees. In a blog post, it pronounced that all of a employees are in a republic “legally,” observant that Intel was co-founded by an immigrant.

We are providing support to potentially impacted employees, all of whom are in this republic lawfully. As a association co-founded by an immigrant, we continue to support central immigration. We will continue to yield any impacted employees with Intel’s full support.


Salesforce CEO Mark Benioff tweeted:


Mark Zuckerberg also wrote opposite a executive sequence in a prolonged post on Facebook:

My good grandparents came from Germany, Austria and Poland. Priscilla’s relatives were refugees from China and Vietnam. The United States is a republic of immigrants, and we should be unapproachable of that.

Like many of you, I’m endangered about a impact of a new executive orders sealed by President Trump.

That said, we was blissful to hear President Trump contend he’s going to “work something out” for Dreamers — immigrants who were brought to this republic during a immature age by their parents. Right now, 750,000 Dreamers advantage from a Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) module that allows them to live and work legally in a US. we wish a President and his group keep these protections in place, and over a subsequent few weeks I’ll be operative with a group during to find ways we can help.


Twitter’s CEO Jack Dorsey assimilated a tech leaders in hostile a ban:


Tony Fadell, the founder of Nest, has affianced to benefaction to a ACLU:

Chris Sacca is an early Twitter financier who instituted a trend of charity to compare donations to those who will respond with receipts.

Along with central responses from companies and CEOs, several other tech executives, including Silicon Valley investors, have affianced to benefaction to compare ACLU donations amid immigration anathema protests.

– We will continue to keep this post updated… Executive sequence can be accessed here [PDF]

About the Author

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these html tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>