Published On: Thu, May 7th, 2020

Magic Leap’s $2.6 billion attract and switch

Two years ago we attended an “Innovation in Immersive Storytelling” eventuality during Industrial Light Magic, featuring a Chief Game Wizard of Magic Leap. we should have famous then, from all a stretched corporate incantation in that sentence, that their passing was inevitable. But in fact we went into that speak a Magic Leap skeptic, and came out … reduction so.

Magic Leap drew in a lot of loyal believers over a years; $2.6 billion worth. Investors enclosed Andreessen Horowitz, Kleiner Perkins, Google (not Google Ventures — Google itself) and many many more. Sundar Pichai assimilated Magic Leap’s board. And did they rave. we mean, it’s a VC’s pursuit to soap-box about their portfolio companies, yet this was different:

Now there is something new. Not only an order-of-magnitude some-more pixels or a faster support rate, yet – interjection to sensors and optics and mobile phone volumes and breakthroughs in mechanism prophesy – something we always dreamed of … The product is extraordinary … this is different

— Bing Gordon of Kleiner Perkins.

It was impossibly healthy and roughly differing — you’re in a room, and there’s a dragon drifting around, it’s jaw-dropping and we couldn’t get a grin off of my face

— Legendary Pictures CEO Thomas Tull

Legendary and a16z had formerly invested in Oculus Rift. Tull even told TechCrunch “Magic Leap takes a totally opposite approach.” This is generally engaging since when Magic Leap finally — finally, after 5 years and $1.6 billion — expelled a product, Oculus’s Palmer Luckey wrote a truly sardonic teardown of a Magic Leap One. Again, approbation he would do so … yet a sum are utterly distinguished …

They call it a “Lightwear”. This is a partial that has gotten a many hype over a years, with unconstrained speak of “Photonic Lightfield Chips”, “Fiber Scanning Laser Displays”, “projecting a digital light margin into a user’s eye”, and a holy-grail guarantee of elucidate vergence-accommodation conflict, an emanate that has tormented HMDs for decades … TL;DR: The ostensible “Photonic Lightfield Chips” are only waveguides interconnected with contemplative sequential-color LCOS displays and LED illumination, a same record everybody else has been regulating for years, including Microsoft in their last-gen HoloLens. The ML1 is a not a “lightfield projector” or arrangement by any broadly supposed definition

What happened to that “completely opposite approach?”

It’s value observant there was some spin-that-more-than-verged-on-deception going on. Magic Leap sent an email to press with a video and a explain “This is a diversion we’re personification around a bureau right now”; subsequently, The Information suggested that whole video was F/X, combined by Weta Workshop.

ML afterwards expelled another video “shot directly by Magic Leap record on 10/14/15, though a use of special effects or compositing.” Was that true? Definitely a doubt value asking, in light of what had happened with a prior video. But all things considered, a answer seems to be: “probably.” See also Kevin Kelly’s frugally minute megafeature on ML for Wired in 2016:

All 3 vital MR headsets rest on images that are projected lateral onto a semitransparent material—usually potion with a cloaking of nanoscale ridges. The user sees a outward universe by a glass, while a practical elements are projected from a light source during a corner of a potion and afterwards reflected into a user’s eyes by a beam-splitting nano-ridges. Magic Leap claims that a device is singular in a approach it beams light into a eye, yet a association declines to explain it serve during this time.

How to block this with Luckey’s — so distant as we know, undisputed — news that Magic Leap’s mega-hyped “Lightwear” record is zero even remotely special? To contend zero of their contest disaster to recover a product that sparked anything remotely like a same fun or unrestrained that a inner demos sparked in investors and journalists?

The answer is straightforward: “The Beast.”

As The Information’s Reed Albergotti suggested some-more than 3 years ago, “The Beast” was Magic Leap’s strange demo box. It was all people said. It was stunning, dreamlike, breakthrough technology. And it weighed “several hundred pounds.”

“The Beast” was followed by “The Cheesehead,” that fit on a tellurian head, and “showed they could miniaturize a light margin vigilance generator they’d invented” … yet still weighed “tens of pounds,” apparently distant too complicated for any real-world applications. (There are cinema of both in a related CNET piece.)

“The Beast” and “The Cheesehead” assistance explain a mixed rounds of large try investment. But afterwards — could Magic Leap miniaturize their breakthrough record further, to anything indeed releasable?

Clearly they could not, and that’s a crux of a matter, a answer to how and because Magic Leap lifted $2.6 billion dollars, afterwards laid off half a employees, while frequency releasing anything during all in 7 years. To quote Vanity Fair quoting The Information quoting CEO Rony Abovitz:

The record behind The Beast is “not unequivocally what we’re eventually going to be shipping,” Abovitz told The Information, adding that prototypes were merely good for display investors and others “what was good about it, what was not.”

Intended or not–I assume it wasn’t–Magic Leap became a $2.6 billion bait-and-switch, a consequences of that are now all too apparent.

“Why are people still giving Magic Leap money?” a possess Lucas Matney asked a year ago. Their device sales were terrible. Last month they sought an merger for a $10B cost tab Josh Constine righteously called “crazy.” Then they laid off half a association and pivoted to enterprise. Now a doubt we’re seeking is “What happens if Magic Leap shuts down?”

Will “The Beast”‘s record eventually make a approach into vital bedrooms and dorm bedrooms and offices? Maybe. Was that a idea value betting $2.6 billion on over 6 years starting in 2014? Another maybe. But it was a gamble that did not compensate off. Ultimately, Magic Leap’s story isn’t one that should feed outrage, or anger, as most as perfect unhappiness that hardware is so hard, and that tellurian senses — generally steer — make for such a severe growth platform.

About the Author