Published On: Mon, Jan 8th, 2018

James Damore only filed a category movement lawsuit opposite Google, observant it discriminates opposite white masculine conservatives

James Damore, a former Google operative who was dismissed in Aug after posting a memo to an inner Google summary house arguing that women might not be equally represented in tech given they are biologically reduction able of engineering, has filed a category movement lawsuit opposite a association in Santa Clara Superior Court in Northern California.

His claims: that Google foul discriminates opposite white group whose domestic views are unpopular with a executives.

Damore is assimilated in a 161-page fit by another former Google operative named David Gudeman, who spent 3 years with Google operative on a query engine. According to Gudeman’s LinkedIn profile, he left a association in Dec 2016 and has been self-employed since.

The lawsuit, filed by Dhillon Law Group, says it aims to paint all employees of Google who’ve been discriminated opposite due to their “perceived regressive domestic views by Google,” due to “their masculine gender by Google” and “due to their Caucasian competition by Google.”

More specifically, it accuses Google of singling out, mistreating and evenly punishing and terminating employees who “expressed views devious from a infancy perspective during Google on domestic subjects lifted in a workplace and applicable to Google’s practice policies and a business, such as ‘diversity’ employing policies, ‘bias sensitivity’ or ‘social justice’…”

Damore isn’t holding behind any punches here. According to his filing, Google employs “illegal employing quotas to fill a preferred percentages of women and adored minority candidates, and plainly shames managers of business units who destroy to accommodate their  quotas—in a process, plainly denigrating masculine and Caucasian employees as reduction adored than others.”

The fit also claims that “numerical participation of women distinguished during Google” was formed “solely due to their gender” while a “presence of Caucasians and males was mocked with ‘boos’ during companywide weekly meetings.”

Somewhat redundantly, it adds that Damore, Gudeman and “other category members” were “ostracized, belittled, and punished for their heterodox domestic views, and for a combined impiety of their birth resources of being Caucasians and/or males.”

The lawsuit is seeking monetary, non-monetary and punitive remedies.

Damore’s banishment final summer became a speak of a nation, with many in Silicon Valley angry that Google didn’t act even some-more quickly to cancel him. Elsewhere, many wondered either a banishment would have a chilling outcome on employees’ ability to plainly plead their viewpoints.

Google pronounced it dismissed Damore for violating a formula of control and advancing “harmful gender stereotypes in a workplace.” Damore duration began a kind of press tour, disapproval a association for being close-minded and worse. In an talk with CNBC, for example, he compared being a regressive during Google to “being happy in a 1950s.”

In a press discussion this afternoon, Damore’s attorney, Harmeet Dhillon, a California deputy for a Republican National Committee, elaborated some-more on a really extensive censure and argued that her stream clients are distant from alone.

In fact, she pronounced she spoke with “dozens” of employees during Google to delineate a lawsuit and that she expects there will be “future lawsuits” to explore, as well.

To underscore her indicate that Google’s policies need to be amended, she cited supposed TGIF meetings during Google, revelation reporters that during Damore’s tenure, “managers were called out and abashed and mocked if they didn’t have 50/50 gender relation in [their respective] units.” She called a idea “fair” though asked, rhetorically: “How do we get there? Job fairs. Making yourself some-more attractive. Not by saying, ‘White guy, we can’t have that pursuit given that’s indifferent for a lady or [other] minority.’”

The new fit isn’t a usually one Google is carrying to urge itself against. In September, 3 womanlike former Google employees filed a lawsuit opposite a company, observant it discriminates opposite women. To wit, says a suit, Google pays women during all levels of a association reduction than men, as good as assigns them reduce pursuit tiers with reduction event for ceiling mobility. Last month, a fourth complainant assimilated their suit.

The Labor Department is alone questioning systemic compensate taste during a company.

Google says it hasn’t found a compensate opening in a possess analysis.

You can review a lawsuit filed by Damore and Gudeman here:

James Damore vs. Google: Class Action Lawsuit by TechCrunch on Scribd

Featured Image: James Damore/Twitter

About the Author

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these html tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>