Published On: Mon, Aug 31st, 2015

India’s Antitrust Commission Accuses Google Of Rigging Its Search Results


Less than a week after it responded to anti-competition claims laid down by a EU, Google is under-fire once again for a business practices. This time in India.

The Competition Commission of India (CCI) has charged a U.S. association with paraphernalia hunt formula to advantage a many businesses, as Economic Times reports. Google copped a $166,000 fine final year for unwell to concur with this probe, yet this time around, a misfortune box unfolding could see it fined adult to 10 percent of its revenue — a association posted a net income of $14 billion on $66 billion in income for 2014 — according to reports.

TechCrunch understands that a CCI’s request is over 600 pages in length, although the arch concerns core around how Google positions and uses a possess services with a hunt engine. Like a initial European investigation, Indian authorities seem to trust that its search engine is bearing a company’s maps service, transport sites, and promotion products, during a responsibility of competitors and those that use a promotion services.

As partial of a probe, a CCI sought out attention opinions on Google’s position. Economic Times reported that a brood of high-profile record companies — including Flipkart, Facebook, and Nokia HERE — advanced a complaint, that was primarily filed by wedlock service Bharat, nonprofit Consumer Unity and Trust Society. TechCrunch understands from sources, though, that it wasn’t all one-way traffic. Other companies had uttered no censure in response to the various accusations levied opposite Google, and those embody Times Internet, Make My Trip, Group M, and Rediff.

Google has until Sep 10 to record a response, after that it must present a box to the commission.

“We’re now reviewing this news from a CCI’s ongoing investigation. We continue to work closely with a CCI and sojourn assured that we approve entirely with India’s foe laws,” a Google orator told TechCrunch.

“Regulators and courts around a world, including in a U.S., Germany, Taiwan, Egypt and Brazil, have looked into and found no concerns on many of a issues lifted in this report,” a repute added.

Google frequently tweaks a services — it did so after an FTC examine in a U.S. in 2013 — and generally it claims that a products are developed to yield a best probable knowledge for end-users. Meanwhile, a CIC, like other anti-trust organizations, is entrance at things from a rival standpoint, and how a marketplace is influenced by Google’s services and their dominance.

The U.S. association strike behind during a EU with some flattering clever statements final week, yet for now it looks to be going by a perfect towering of paperwork that a CIC has released. India’s range of review appears to be a lot wider than what we have, or are seeing, in other tools of a world. That could work dual ways. It could be a pointer that India’s classification has vital issues with how many tools of Google are run; or it could be a pointer that a CCI is probing as many areas as probable with a wish of alighting a jab.

We’ll have to wait until Sep 10 to know more. The intelligent income is on Google adhering to a guns and responding in India as it has finished in Europe and other tools of a world: with fighting talk.

Featured Image: Josh Edelson/AFP/Getty Images

About the Author

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these html tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>