Published On: Thu, Sep 7th, 2017

Facebook Admits Selling Political Ads to Russia During 2016 US Election

Facebook sole ads to a murky Russian association seeking to aim electorate during a 2016 US choosing campaign, a association told congressional investigators progressing this Wednesday. Facebook’s arch confidence officer, Alex Stamos, after suggested in a blog post published currently that over 470 accounts spent over $100,000 to buy around 3,000 ads. The association member told a congressional cabinet that it has associated these inauthentic accounts to a Russian “troll farm” that has a story of pulling pro-Kremlin propaganda.

Focus of a US choosing ads was divisive issues, not candidates

The amicable media hulk reported that a infancy of ads didn’t concentration on a dual presidential candidates, though instead amplified divisive amicable issues like immigration and LGBT matters. While a association didn’t name that claimant these ads favored, it claimed that a tiny apportionment of these ads directly named both a Republican Donald Trump and Democrat Hillary Clinton. The ads reportedly started in a summer of 2015.

russiaRelated Russia Jails Notorious Shaltay-Boltay (Anonymous International) Hackers

“There have been a lot of questions given a 2016 US choosing about Russian division in a electoral process,” a association wrote. “One doubt that has emerged is either there’s a tie between a Russian efforts and ads purchased on Facebook. These are critical claims and we’ve been reviewing a operation of activity on a height to assistance know what happened.”

In reviewing a ads buys, we have found approximately $100,000 in ad spending from Jun of 2015 to May of 2017 – compared with roughly 3,000 ads – that was connected to about 470 inauthentic accounts and Pages in defilement of a policies. Our research suggests these accounts and Pages were dependent with one another and expected operated out of Russia.

Facebook combined that it has common a commentary with a US authorities questioning these issues and has given close down these accounts and pages.

In a second review, a association also looked into ads bought from accounts with US IP addresses with a “very diseased signals of a connection” with Russia. “In this partial of a review, we found approximately $50,000 in potentially politically associated ad spending on roughly 2,200 ads,” a association added.

“An Update On Information Operations On Facebook” – a company’s turnaround

The latest explanation comes after months of critique over a amicable media association permitting a network to be used for swelling feign information forward of a 2016 US election. Following a election, arch Mark Zuckerberg (who, some believe, is eyeing for a domestic position himself) had pronounced that a association will start flagging articles that are deliberate feign with assistance from fact-checking organizations. Then in July, a Facebook orator pronounced a association hasn’t seen any “evidence that Russian actors bought ads on Facebook in tie with a election”.

hacker1Related Russia-Linked APT Group Discovered Spying on Embassies Using a Newly Uncovered Backdoor

Wednesday’s matter is Facebook’s initial acknowledgment of a problem that it has formerly continued to deny. The latest avowal adds to a prior justification expelled both by a private cybersecurity firms and a US comprehension village of Russia perplexing to change a US choosing campaign.

The association gave a latest matter behind sealed doors to a US investigators probing into a Russian division in a Nov election. Earlier in January, a US comprehension village had resolved that Russia had interfered in several ways, including regulating amicable media to widespread feign news to change voters.

While $100,000 doesn’t paint a vast choosing promotion campaign, it does supplement to a prior allegations that Russia attempted to lean a US choosing outcome. More importantly, it is also a pointy annulment from CEO Zuckerberg’s progressing comments where he pronounced that someone regulating Facebook to change a US choosing outcome is a “pretty crazy idea”.

About the Author

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these html tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>