Published On: Sat, Mar 18th, 2017

Benchmark Bash: Leaked Galaxy S8 & Galaxy S8+, Exynos 8895 Vs Snapdragon 835 Benchmark Showdown

The Samsung Galaxy S8 and Galaxy S8+ are due in reduction than dual weeks. The span have kick their successors in a perfect volume of leaks out there. We’ve got information covering internals, features, design, specifications and more. So it’s usually high time that a rough comparison is carried out. The S8 and a incomparable hermit have also flush in benchmark leaks so far. We’ve taken these and compared them to see that one is improved performing. Take a demeanour next to find out more.

Snapdragon 835 Vs Exynos 8895; Which One Performs Better On Samsung’s Galaxy S8 and Galaxy S8+?

To start off, there are a sum of 4 variants of a Galaxy S8 for a comparison. Out of these, information on 3 is accessible during a moment. So we’ll start by holding a minute demeanour for a Galaxy S8, powered by a Snapdragon 835 and 4GB RAM. We’ll afterwards conduct to a Galaxy S8+ also powered by a Snapdragon 835 and finally, to a Galaxy S8+ powered by Samsung’s home grown, Exynos 8895 processor.

Both a Snapdragon and a Exynos are made on Samsung’s 10nm FinFET process. This will change things for opening and estimate energy in 2017’s flagships by utterly a bit. The categorical concentration of 10nm is opening efficiency, that is a incomparable regard for smartphones given a normal space and battery constraints. In fact, for Qualcomm, a US chip hulk promises that 80% of a Snapdragon 835’s opening bucket will go by a LITTLE core cluster, withdrawal a energy complete cores for name operations.

Overview:

Starting from a simple overview, a Snapdragon 835 has nearby matching singular core scores for a Samsung Galaxy S8 and Galaxy S8+. The device magnitude 1916 and 1929 respectively. Clock speeds for a processor are 1.90GHz and RAM stands during 4GB. Comparing these with a Exynos 8895, Samsung’s processor once again takes a lead over Qualcomm. Running during 1.6GHz with 8 cores, a Exynos has a magnitude of 1978 points, that is a good burst from a US counterpart.

Moving towards mutli-core results, a differences start to get a bit some-more sheer over here. The Snapdragon 835 temperament Galaxy S8 and S8+ magnitude 6011 and 6084 points respectively. The S8+ with a Exynos 8895 scores 6375 point, that is a large burst over Qualcomm’s offerings. These formula uncover us that chronological trends will continue this year as well. Samsung’s Exynos lineup absolutely beats a Snapdragon in pre-10nm formula as well.

Single-Core Results:

Before we take a demeanour during a results, it’s applicable to explain a few pivotal terms. As you’ll see in a images above, singular core formula are divided into crypto, integer, floating indicate and memory. For a basement of a comparison, Crypto evaluates encryption capabilities of your smartphone. Since Lollipop, enabling encryption on a device has been left to manufacturers. An capacitate requires information to be encrypted before a ‘written’ and decrypted before a ‘read’. This, as you’d expect, formula in a poignant dump in altogether performance.

Integer and floating points simply paint information groups for a processor. An integer is a easier one of a span given it does not use decimals for approximation. Floating indicate is also critical for opening though increases in aptitude when we cruise multimedia and other work loads. A high floating indicate magnitude means that your processor/device performs improved in games, digest and other such applications.

Moving towards scores, a Snapdragon 835 on a Galaxy S8 and S8+ performs likewise in crypto and integer scores. The processor scores 1171/1914 and 1176/1931 respectively for a devices. The Exynos 8895 blows a Snapdragon 835 out of a park in integer scores. Samsung’s processor scores 2000 in this metric and a high 1255 in crypto. Moving towards floating point, a Galaxy S8(S835), Galaxy S8+(S835) and Galaxy S8+(E8995) magnitude 1335,1339 and 1560 respectively. This trend reverses on memory scores, with a Snapdragon 835 Galaxy S8+ holding a lead with 3001 points. Memory scores magnitude how fit a device is in providing adequate and timely information to a processor during complete computing.

Multi-Core Results:

Multi ore crypto opening stays a same opposite a trio. The Exynos 8895 comes out on top, with a Samsung Galaxy S8 with a Snapdragon 835 bagging a tighten second spot. There isn’t most movement in integer scores either. The GS8 with Snapdragon 835, GS8+ with Snapdragon 835 and a S8+ with a Eynos 8895 magnitude 7564, 7653 and 7759 respectively.

Move over to floating indicate and Samsung gets a large lead over Qualcomm. The Galaxy S8+ with Exynos 8895 scores 6480 points that outlines a clever lead over a Snapdragon 835 S8+ that has a magnitude of 5760. Finally, a personification margin for memory in multi core formula is most some-more even when compared to singular core results. All 3 processors magnitude around 3100 with a Eynos 8895 holding a lead. All in all, these formula paint a identical design as single-core and put a Eynos 8895 absolutely during a top.

Conclusion:

All in all, Samsung’s Exynos 8895 is a transparent leader in these results. Whether a singular or multi core, floating indicate or integer scores, a Exynos 8895 is clearly a improved processor according to these results. The usually metric where a Snapdragon 835 comes out on tip is singular core memory. Given Qualcomm’s 80% singular core effort promise, a US chip hulk seems to have sufficient prepared for this. Of course, given these are pre-launch, rough results, you’d be brash to take anything as set in stone.

The Samsung Galaxy S8 and Galaxy S8+ will launch in reduction than dual weeks. In further to a Snapdragon 835 and Exynos 8895, a span will underline several large upgrades. These operation from a symbol giveaway front facade, to a vigour supportive home symbol and 7 tone options. Samsung will also launch a practical partner ‘Bixby’ and desktop platform, ‘DEx’ with a pair. Thoughts? Let us know what we consider in a comments territory next and stay tuned. We’ll keep we updated on a latest.

About the Author

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these html tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>