Published On: Sun, Jun 20th, 2021

Apple AirTags UX teardown: The trade-off between remoteness and user experience

Apple’s plcae devices — called AirTags — have been out for some-more than a month now. The initial impressions were good, though as we resolved behind in April: “It will be engaging to see these play out once AirTags are out removing mislaid in a wild.”

That’s accurately what a proprietor UX analyst, Peter Ramsey, has been doing for a final month — intentionally losing AirTags to exam their user knowledge during a limits.

This Extra Crunch disdainful is a simplified review around this Built for Mars article, that helps overpass a opening between Apple’s mistakes and how we can make suggestive changes to your product’s UX.

AirTag not reachable

There are dual primary functions of an blunder message:

  1. To forewarn a user what has left wrong (and how it affects them).
  2. To assistance a user solve a issue.

Most businesses do a decent pursuit during a initial one, though it’s singular that a product will proactively obsess over a second.

Typically, Apple is one of a few examples that do — it’s indisputably one of a leaders in discerning design. Which is since we was astounded to see Apple’s blunder summary when an AirTag is not reachable:

Image Credits: Built for Mars screenshot

There’s a outrageous volume of ambiguity in a matter “move around to connect,” and it fails to discuss that this blunder could be since a AirTag’s batteries have been removed.

Instead, Apple should make this summary clickable, that opens a modal to learn some-more about this issue.

About the Author