Published On: Sun, Dec 18th, 2016

2016’s Best; Exynos 8890 Vs Snapdragon 821 Vs A10 Fusion Vs Snapdragon 820 Vs Kirin 960 Benchmark Breakdown

2016 has seen a lot of upgrades when we speak mobile hardware. The year will be a final to underline 14nm in flagship smartphones. All vital foundries and manufacturers are set to entrance 10nm subsequent year, with Qualcomm and Samsung in a lead. Now, as a year ends, it’s time to demeanour during a opposite processors that graced us and make a comparison. To that end, folks over during Android Authority have carried out a extensive benchmark breakdown. Take a demeanour next to find out more.

Performance:

Starting from performance, let’s initial take a demeanour during Antutu and GeekBench singular core scores. The processors that are being compared over here are a Snapdragon 821, Snapdragon 820, Exynos 8890, Exynos 7420, Kirin 960, Snapdragon 810 and a Helio X20. For Antutu, it’s a Snapdragon 821 that takes a transparent lead, with a Exynos 8890 following in during second. Qualcomm was right to launch a 821 in H2 2016, as a Snapdragon 820 clearly underneath performs over here.

Moving towards GeekBench Single core results, a leader here is Huawei’s Kirin 960. While this competence sound startling during first, a processor is using ARM’s Cortex A73 cores. These are tip of a line when it come to performance, and this fact is clearly represented in a benchmark scores. In second place we have Samsung’s Exynos 8890. The processor facilities Samsung’s M1 cores and ARM’s Cortex A53 cores. In third, we have a Cortex A72 on a Helio X25, made by MediaTek.

Moving towards GeekBech Multi core and browser tests, we get churned results. For starters, if we take a demeanour during a third picture above, you’ll see that Apple’s A10 Fusion performs usually as expected. It tops a charts in singular core and Basemark tests yet comes in during third place, behind a Exnyos 8890 and Kirin 960 in GeekBench Multi core test. That’s given a Exynos and a Kirin run 4×4 variations of M1, Cortex A53 and Cortex A73, Cortex A53 cores. Apple unequivocally isn’t a fan of multi cores and this is illustrated in benchmarks.

In a initial image, it’s a Samsung Exynos 8890 that comes out on tip in Vellamo and Dhrystone The Korean tech hulk has softened a SoC diversion significantly given a Exyno 7420; during a time when Qualcomm faced throttling issues with a Snapdragon 810. The Kirin 960 tops a Exynos in Basemark scores, yet not by much. The 960 does have ARM’s Cortex A73 core ticking underneath a hood, so it’s healthy for it to perform well. In Dhrystone, it’s a Helio X25 that comes in second, followed by a Snapdragon 820 and 821 respectively.

Custom Tests:

Now, we’re going to change towards some tradition tests designed by Gary. They’ve been automatic to exam specific areas of a processor’s performance, so let’s see what we’ve got here. The initial exam goes by a rather radical name of “Hashes, burble sorts, tables and primes.” As you’d have approaching guessed, it calculates a time taken for a CPU to calculate 100 SHA1 hashes and afterwards subsequently computes a burble arrange on an array of 1000 items. It afterwards shuffles a vast list 1 million times and afterwards deduction to calculate a initial 10 million primes.

Taking a demeanour during a formula of HBTP, a Kirin 960 takes a lead with a Snapdragon 821 entrance in a tighten second. It’s followed by a Helio X25 and afterwards a Snapdragon 820. The second exam is a 2D H2O dump simulation, designed to bar a GPU from testing. It runs during 60 FPS and tests dual drops descending in a enclosure per second. Over here, it’s a Kirin 960 that takes a lead once again, with a startling opening by a Exynos 7420 and a Exynos 8890 in second and third places respectively. The Apple A10 Fusion doesn’t conduct to transport any improved in 2D make-believe either. The processor usually beats a Exynos 8890 with a slight margin.

SoC-showdown-2016-terrain4-16x9

Graphics:

Moving towards graphics, there unequivocally is no warn here. The Snapdragon 821, with a Adreno 530 leads comfortably, followed by a Snapdragon 820 in second place. There’s no information for a Apple A10 Fusion, so we can’t tell we how good Cupertino’s charity stands in comparison to a rest. In third place we have a Kirin 960, that unequivocally is behaving improved than expectations would have it.

Qualcomm’s famous for a GPUs, even if a US manufacturer manages to onslaught with estimate performance. Even when a Snapdragon 810 unsuccessful with throttling, a Adreno GPU managed to tip benchmarks consistently. Samsung unequivocally needs to step adult a GPU diversion too, as a Korean tech giant’s faith on ARM’s Mali array doesn’t seem to be doing it any favors.

image_keith-kressin-qualcomm-ben-suh-samsung-with-10nm-snapdragon-835.-feature

Conclusion:

To conclude, we’ve got a integrate of surprises today. 2016’s processors seem to perform usually as you’d design them too, with a difference of a Huawei Kirin 960. The Chinese maker’s processor tops a infancy of benchmarks and is unequivocally a processor to select if we wish to try something new. Otherwise, it’s a Snapdragon 821 for US smartphone lovers and a Exynos 8890 for Samsung fans. The Exynos is a clever processor and Samsung is doing a lot of things right with a tradition M1 cores.

Qualcomm’s Kryo cores still haven’t taken off fully, as a Snapdragon 821 manages to stay within a tip tier usually by a margin. We’re fervent to see how things change in 2017, when a Snapdragon 835 is expected. Performance will burst opposite all platforms, generally as 10nm finally creates it to a market. Thoughts? Let us know what we consider in a comments territory next and stay tuned for a latest.

Courtesy: AndroidAuthority

About the Author

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these html tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>